The unfairness discretion embodied in s90 Evidence Act (NSW) 1995, is limited to admission evidence._x000D_
_x000D_
In addition to the so-called s90 Discretion, s138 Evidence Act also provides the Court with the ability to exercise its discretion to exclude admission evidence – on the basis that the manner in which the admission was obtained was somehow unlawful or improper._x000D_
_x000D_
Critically discuss how the s90 Discretion is currently viewed and applied by the Courts and whether you think there is any utility in the retention of s90, as it currently stands._x000D_
_x000D_
You should reflect upon the following materials and authorities when addressing the topic:_x000D_
€¢ Em v the Queen (2007) 232 CLR 67_x000D_
€¢ R v Em [2003] NSWCCA 374_x000D_
€¢ Uniform Evidence Law – ALRC Report 102 (2006)_x000D_
_x000D_
Your response should attempt to:_x000D_
_x000D_
a. Explain the various lead authorities on the issue of the application of s90 and its interplay with s138, by examining the reasoning and analysis in the respective decisions. (There is no need to recount the facts)_x000D_
_x000D_
b. Provide a critical evaluation of the perceived utility of s90 as well as a reasoned discussion identifying any potential detriment and / or benefits that may flow from the repeal of s90._x000D_
_x000D_
c. Explain your reasoning why you would / would not support the retention of s90 (with reference to your critical evaluation of its utility)_x000D_
_x000D_
For a custom paper on the above topic or any other topic, place your order now!_x000D_
_x000D_
_x000D_
_x000D_
€¢ On-time delivery guarantee_x000D_
_x000D_
€¢ Masters and PhD-level writers_x000D_
_x000D_
€¢ Automatic plagiarism check_x000D_
_x000D_
€¢ 100% Privacy and Confidentiality_x000D_
_x000D_
€¢ High Quality custom-written papers
