Roman aqueducts ANALYTICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

Roman aqueducts ANALYTICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

Work type:   Annotated bibliography

Format:         Chicago / Turabian

Pages:            4 pages ( 1100 words, Double spaced

Academic level:       Undergrad. (yrs 3-4)

Subject or discipline:         History

Title:   WEEK 4 ANALYTICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY

Number of sources:           5

Paper instructions:

Select a topic that will form the basis for your Annotated Bibliography. You should choose some topic that deals with some aspect of world history to 1500. This covers a broad area so you can use your imagination.

 

TOPIC: Roman aqueducts

 

Directions to Follow:

 

Provide a complete citation for the site, including the URL and your date of access. Note that the required citation style is Chicago Manual of Style. For an example of what elements to include in your citation, go to Course Content and review the Brief Primer to Citing Sources in Chicago Humanities Style (B=bibliography). In the Sample Citations section, look under Online Journal Articles and note that you need to provide the name of the database you found the article in and your date of access.

 

Analytical Annotated Bibliography Components:

 

  1. Begin each annotated bibliography entry by identifying the source in correct Chicago Manual of Style documentation.

 

  1. A brief description of the author’s topic, thesis, and methodology. In other words, in what academic discipline does the work fall in (history, literature, social science, women’s studies, cultural studies, etc.)? What kind of evidence does the author draw upon?

 

  1. A concise outline of the main points in the text.

 

  1. A statement about the author’s goals and his/her intended audience. Are there any clear biases?

 

  1. MOST IMPORTANTLY–Your critical evaluation of the text’s usefulness for the investigation of your topic. What are the strengths of the source? What are the deficiencies or limitations of the source?

 

  1. Did the article help you to further understand the topic? If so, explain how. If not, explain what information might have been helpful.

 

  1. Explain how each of your sources compares to the others. Are there any general trends you see in your selected books and articles?