How has the IRS handled the challenge of US persons hiding assets outside the US? How have FBAR and FATCA reporting helped with this effort? What have been the most effective means in dealing with this problem?

How has the IRS handled the challenge of US persons hiding assets outside the US? How have FBAR and FATCA reporting helped with this effort? What have been the most effective means in dealing with this problem?

Discipline:
Accounting

Type of service:
Research Paper

Spacing:
Double spacing

Paper format:
Chicago / Turabian

Number of pages:
12 pages

Number of sources:
6 sources

Paper details

How has the IRS handled the challenge of US persons hiding assets outside the US? How have FBAR and FATCA reporting helped with this effort? What have been the most effective means in dealing with this problem?

Standard Tax Citations
Citatior.rs are Presented
rlocuments.
Statutory
Constitution
Code
Public Laws
‘freaty
Committee RePort
for illustrative and prescriptive purposes. They do not necessarily track to actual
U.S. Const. art. I, $ 8, ci. 2.
U.S. Const. amend, XIV, S 2.
s 101(bx2xBxii).
P .L. 1.12-240 (American ‘f axpayer Relief Act of 2AL2) ‘
Convention Between the Government of the United States of America
and the Government of Iceland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with ResPect to ‘faxes on
Income, October 23,2007, United States – Iceland, Article i4′
convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention
of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income’ U’S’-Austl”
art. 1, Aug. 6,1982,35 U.S.T. 1999′
H.Rpt. ll4-357 Conference Report (to accompany H’R’22)’P’L’
Ll4-g4, U.S. House. Fixing America’s Surface ‘fransportation Act’

]oint Committee on Taxation, Description of the Chairman’s Mark of
the Miners Protection Act of 2016 (ICX-84-16), September 19’20)’6′
Reg.5 1.263(a)-1.
T.D. 9636.
Reg. S 1.163-8T.
Prop. Reg. $ i.263(9)-1.
Rev. Rul. 2013-20, 2A].l^-40 I.R.B. 272
Rev. Ru1. 96-58,1996-2 C.8.6
Rev. Proc. 20i3-30, 2A1336l.R.B. i73′
Ltr. Rul. 2016$0A9 or PLR 201643009′
TAM 200908050.
Notice 2010-50, 2010-27 I.R.B’ 12.
Announcement 2013-20, 2}fi.14 I’R’B’ 761′
GCM 39893
cc{ 201643023
AOD 2016-0 1, 2016-16 lRB, 41 412016.
Estate o.f D. R. Daly,3 B.T.A. 1042 (1926).
Administrative
Regulation
-freasury Decision
Iemporary Reguiation
Proposed Regulation
Revenue Ruling
Revenue Ruling (before 2009)
Revenue Procedure
Letter Ruling
‘fechnicai Advice Memo
Notice
Annouucement
General Counsel Memorandum
Chiel Counsel Advice
Actiolr on Decision
Iudicial
Board of Tax APPeals:
GPO rePorter
Tax Court Regular:
(temporary citation)
-fax Court Regular:
GPO rePorter
‘l’zrx Court Memo:
CCH:
l’homson Reuters
Tax Court SurnmarY OPir-rion
District Court:
\Vest:
C(]H:
-1’hotnson Reuters:
Mehan, MartY, 122 T’C. , No. 5 (2004).
Mehan, Marty, 1’22 T.C. 396 (2004)’
Dixon, Michel,78 T.C.M 462 (1999).
Dixan, Michel, T.C. Memo 1999-3i0
lnrlrit lljazi, T.C. Summary Opinion 20lA-59′
\ahull v. u.5., 602 I’. Supp, 2d L87 (DCt’ D’C” 2OO9)
Bohall v, u.s., 2009-1 USTC , 50,307 (Dct. D’c’)
Bohall v. U.S., t03 AFTR 2d 2009-1338 (DCt’ D’C’)
Esposito i,. U.S., 70 Fed. C1. 558 (2006)
Esposito v. u.s., 20a6-2 usIC 5 50,434 (Fed. C1.)
Esposito v. LlS., 97 AFTR2d 2A06-1733 (Fed. Cl.)
Home Concrete & Suppry, LLC v. U.S., 63.1 b.3d 219 (CA-4, 2011).
Home Cancrete & Sttpply, LLC v, U.5.,2011-1 USTC { 50,341 (CA-1).
Home Concrete & Suppll’, LLC v. U.5., 107 AFTR 2d 20ll-1726 (CA-4)
U.S. ,,,. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., Et Al., 551
u,s. 1 (2008)
U.S. v. Clintntood Elkhorn Mining Co., Et,{1., 128
s. ct. 1s11 (200s)
U.S. v. Clintwood Elkhorn lvlining Co., Et Al.,
2008-1 Lrsl’c { s0,281 (USSC)
U.S. t,. Clinttood Elkhorn Mining Co., Et Al., 101
AFTR 2d 2008-1612 (USSC)
Books
Sawyers, R., Raabe, W., Whittenburg, G., and Gill, S., 2014. Federal Tax Research, iOth ed. X,{ason, OH: South-Westen.r.
Iournals
Everett, J., Hennig, C., and Raabe, \\’., Converting a C Corporation Into an LLC, lottrrtul o.t Toxation \ro1. 113,
No. 2 (August 2010).
Capitalization
Proper nouns and u,ords derir.ed from them are capitalized vr’hi1e comn.ron nouns are not. The names of specitic persons, places, or things are proper nouns. Ali other nout.ts are common nouns. Examples of proper nouns include:
the Congress
Section 172(a)
Regulation S 1.102-1 or the Proposed Regulation (reterences tcl regulations in generai do not need to be
capitalized)
the Fifth Circuit
the ‘lax Court
a revenLle ruling or a private letter ruling
I talics
1n handlr,ritten or t,yped papers In4gl!$ry represerlts italics. The titles of books, magazines. nerr’spirpels,
pamphlets and court cases are shon,n in italics. Examples of items that are italicized include:
ll t t \\’ e a I th o/- .Yaticrir-i
Journal o.f ‘l axatton
Npu’ \’ork Times
Gregory t,. Helt,ering
Note: Do not italicize the titles of 1ega1 documents such as the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Corle.
Court of Federal Claims:
West:
CCH:
Thomson Reuters:
Court of Appeals:
West:
CCH:
Thomson Reuters:
Supreme Court:
GPO:
!Vest:
CCH:
‘llhor:rson Reuters: