Should regulators appoint an independent or two partisan experts?

Should regulators appoint an independent or two partisan experts?

Discipline: Economics

Type of service: Thesis

Spacing: Double spacing

Paper format: Harvard

Number of pages: 40 pages

Number of sources: 25 sources

Paper details:

-Adocates applied to regulators.

-Start the paper by giving a story of the whole topic.

-Define the problem.

-Give clear definitions.

-You should perhaps start the analysis with a 2×2 Matrix. One dimension is the decison (“in favor of A, B), the other dimension is the state of nature (the decision for A is favorable, the deicison for B is favorable). The decison maker’s/regulator’s problme should be that the state of nature is not perfectly observable, and the partisan advocates/the independent agent would gather and reveal information. Now, where are the differences between these two options? (Effort, partisan bias).

-Develop a model of two independent experts and an independent partisan expert.

-Compare the two models.

-Explain how this paper contributes to the literature

-Define some assumptions

-Explain how the model changes if some parameters change.

-Check biasedness of the assumptions.

-Limitations of the research.

-Findings of the research.

-Propositions.