Florida Department of Management Services, Part I
Type of document Case Study
3 Pages Double Spaced
Subject area Case Study
Academic Level Master
Style APA
References 3
Order description:
CIS 505 Communication Technologies
Case Study 1: Florida Department of Management Services, Part I
Worth 80 points
Read the case study titled “Florida Department of Management Services Part I” found at the end of Chapter 5. Refer to the DMS Website, located at http://www.dms.myflorida.com, for further reference.
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
- Analyze the security mechanisms needed to protect the DMS systems from both state employees and users accessing over the Internet.
- Critique the transition process performed by the DMS in the case study. Then, recommend two (2) alternatives to the IP infrastructure or applications not already mentioned in the case study.
- Critique the merits of the major services found on the DMS Website.
- Recommend an additional service to add to the DMS Website.
- Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note:Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Compare and contrast among local area and wide area network technologies and architectures.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in communication networks.
- Write clearly and concisely about communication networks using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
 Â
Points: 80 | Case Study 1: Florida Department of Management Services, Part I | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Criteria | Unacceptable
Below 70% F |
Fair
70-79% C |
Proficient
80-89% B |
Exemplary
90-100% A |
||||||||||||||||||||
1. Analyze the security mechanisms needed to protect the DMS systems from both state employees and users accessing over the Internet.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the security mechanisms needed to protect the DMS systems from both state employees and users accessing over the Internet. | Partially analyzed the security mechanisms needed to protect the DMS systems from both state employees and users accessing over the Internet. | Satisfactorily analyzed the security mechanisms needed to protect the DMS systems from both state employees and users accessing over the Internet. | Thoroughly analyzed the security mechanisms needed to protect the DMS systems from both state employees and users accessing over the Internet. | ||||||||||||||||||||
2. Critique the transition process performed by the DMS in the case study and recommend two (2) alternatives to the IP infrastructure or applications not already mentioned in the case study. Weight: 30%
|
Did not submit or incompletelycritiqued the transition process performed by the DMS in the case study and did not submit or incompletely recommended two (2) alternatives to the IP infrastructure or applications not already mentioned in the case study. | Partiallycritiqued the transition process performed by the DMS in the case study and partially recommended two (2) alternatives to the IP infrastructure or applications not already mentioned in the case study. | Satisfactorilycritiqued the transition process performed by the DMS in the case study and satisfactorilyrecommended two (2) alternatives to the IP infrastructure or applications not already mentioned in the case study. | Thoroughlycritiqued the transition process performed by the DMS in the case study and thoroughly recommended two (2) alternatives to the IP infrastructure or applications not already mentioned in the case study. |