Why can’t he hear what I’m saying? By Deborah Tannen

Why can’t he hear what I’m saying? By Deborah Tannen

Work type:          Research paper

Format:      APA

Pages:        2 pages ( 550 words, Double spaced

Academic level:  Undergrad. (yrs 1-2)

Subject or discipline:   Literature

Title: Why can’t he hear what I’m saying? By Deborah Tannen

Number of sources:     1

Paper instructions:     

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

1. What is Deborah Tannen’s purpose in writing this article? Which passages best Communicate that purpose?

2. Tannen uses the pronoun you in addressing the reader. Who is Tannen’s Intended audience?

3. Tannen argues that differences in conversational style between men and women cause miscommunication. What examples does she offer in support of this idea? Do you agree with her position?

4. What have you observed as the most important difference between men and women, a difference that sometimes makes communication difficult?

5. Paraphrase Tannen’s definition of culture in paragraph 10. Find another defini tion of culture in a dictionary or encyclopedia. How does it compare with Tannen’s? How does Tannen’s definition fit her purpose?

6. What connections does Tannen make between the “culture” learned as children and the adult behavior of men and women? What behavior does this early pat terning cause? What evidence does she provide, and is the evidence sufficient to make this connection between childhood and adult behavior plausible?

According to Clevette and colleagues, examples of unsafe, common disciplinary actions reviewed by boards of nursing include all of the following EXCEPT-

According to Clevette and colleagues, examples of unsafe, common disciplinary actions reviewed by boards of nursing include all of the following EXCEPT-

a). Destruction or alteration of patient records, including fraudulent charting and/or signatures and/or replacement of records with intent to mislead or deceive.

b). Physical patient abuse, such as when a nurse hits, strikes, or performs similar physical acts of aggression involving patient contact.

c). Practicing beyond the authorized scope, such as administering medications without a physician’s order.

d). Failure to implement safeguards to ensure patient confidentiality and integrity of patients protected health information, violating HIPPA.

). Failure to implement safeguards to ensure patient confidentiality and integrity of patients protected health information, violating HIPPA.

If a nurse does not agree to the discipline set due to a complaint made against this nurse, after reviewing the proposed agreed order, they can request a-

 If a nurse does not agree to the discipline set due to a complaint made against this nurse, after reviewing the proposed agreed order, they can request a-

a). Informal conference

b). Formal conference

c). Informal hearing

d). Formal hearing4). Common nursing remedial education courses required if a nurse is being disciplined are-

a). medication refresher, ethics, geriatric care, nursing jurisprudence, care coordination.

b). ethics course, care coordination, documentation, medication refresher.

c). physical assessment refresher, critical thinking, documentation, medication refresher, geriatric care.

d). nursing jurisprudence, documentation, ethics, medication refresher, physical assessment refresher and critical thinking.

Applying Rule 217 Minor Incident versus Reportable incident

Applying Rule 217 Minor Incident versus Reportable incident

Work type:          Creative writing

Format:      APA

Pages:        1 pages ( 275 words, Double spaced

Academic level:  Undergrad. (yrs 1-2)

Subject or discipline:   Nursing

Title: Writer’s choice

Number of sources:     0

Paper instructions:     

question and Answer

Part 1: Applying Rule 217.16

Let’s review what deems a Minor Incident (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable incident- (217.16 h)-

A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- nurses’ actions may be a violation of a board rule, but does not indicate the nurses continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person.

A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.

Let’s come up with an easy way to remember what is a minor incident- in case you are ever in this situation, whether this happens to you or you are participating on a peer review committee evaluating a fellow nurse’s actions. Think about the word “harp.”

H- no significant Harm

A- nurse must take Accountability

R- easily Remediated

P- no Pattern of this behavior

However, these minor incidents still must be documented, tracked and remedied. The nurse must be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five (5) minor incidents within a 12-month period.

Look at this case study scenario below.

“Nurse Karen is caring for a newly admitted 67-year-old male patient with infectious endocarditis due to a bacterial infection of his prosthetic heart valve.  After blood cultures come back positive for staphylococcus aureus, IV Vancomycin is ordered.  He tells Nurse Karen and the doctor that the last time he got this medication, he experienced hives and hot, itchy skin but he was not allergic to it. The doctor ordered the medication to be infused slowly as to avoid Red Man Syndrome (500 mg IV bag at a rate of two hours as opposed to the standard one hour).  Karen sets the IV pump incorrectly, and the infusion is given within a 30-minute period.  She calls the doctor and immediately gives 50 mg diphenhydramine and ranitidine 50 mg via IV with orders.  The patient experienced mild flushing, but the episode resolved within 20 minutes.  Karen is a well-seasoned nurse with over 20 years of experience and no prior history of incidents.  She took immediate responsibility for this error when meeting with the unit manager.  Karen will now need another RN to witness and sign when she administers IV medication for the next 60 days.  Karen agrees to this plan.” Using the Texas BON Rule 217.16, review (a) a Minor Incident vs. (h) a reportable incident. This information can be found at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp

Based on your assessment of the criteria, was this a Minor Incident or reportable event? Why or Why not? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit. Minor or Reportable?

Why? Or Why not? Include examples from the Rule.

Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review

First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. The purpose of an IBPR is to determine whether a nurse should be reported to the Texas Board of Nursing (BON) for professional misconduct or licensure violations based on one or more such events.

Please use the link provided at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp

to review. Apply the information to this case study-

“Nurse Sam is charting at the nurse’s station where there are

-workers, physicians and a unit secretary gathered.  Sam and the nurse manager have not been co seeing eye to eye lately (verbal altercations both in the halls and in the cafeteria recently).  The nurse manager approaches Sam and loudly states, “I am glad you are here.  Just to let you know, the Incident Based Peer Review Committee is meeting tomorrow, and we are investigating your recent questionable behavior.  I know you have made many recent medication errors and safety violations noted by the Patient Safety Committee.  I also heard you are dating that patient who was in Room 256B last month.  I thought you would want to know this was happening, you could be in big trouble and probably fired.  I don’t have anything official to give you, but you better find a lawyer, although I doubt you can with this short notice.”

How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR? Refer to the Rule listed below and discuss in the text box.

Rule 219.19 a (2) Bad Faith- knowingly or recklessly acting without the supported of reasonable or legal basis, misrepresenting the facts surrounding the facts under review, acting out of malice or personal animosity towards the nurse, acting from a conflict of interest, or knowingly or recklessly denying due process. How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR based on this rule? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.

animal rights euthanasia or global poverty

animal rights euthanasia or global poverty

Instructions

All Files

Messages

Order History

Type of service:  Writing from Scratch

Work type:          Essay (any type)

Format:      APA

Pages:        2 pages ( 550 words, Double spaced

Academic level:  High school

Subject or discipline:   Cultural and Ethnic Studies

Title: Writer’s choice

Number of sources:     0

Paper instructions:     

Explaining an Argument

Before beginning this paper, make sure that you have completed Modules 2 & 3 and taken a look at my feedback from Paper 1. It is also highly recommended that you have read LaFollette’s “Writing a Philosophy Paper” from Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. This paper is worth 10% of your grade in this course and, as a result, will be graded out of 100 pts total. Make sure to follow the following instructions and look at the rubric.

Topic

This paper will explain an argument that you have read on your applied ethics topic (animal rights, euthanasia, or global poverty). You will also begin to think of potential objections to this argument. So, in Part 1, explain one of the arguments from the paper you read in 2.2 or 3.2 on your applied ethics topic (animal rights, euthanasia, or global poverty). This will be the same argument that you explained in Applied Discussion 2 or Applied Discussion 3. Then, in Part 2, you will give three potential objections to the argument and explain which objection you think is the best objection to the argument you have chosen (and why).

Specific Instructions for Structuring the Paper

In your final paper, you will be asked to explain and evaluate an argument. This paper is the beginning of that assignment and will function as a draft for the first part of Paper 3. This paper should be organized according to the rubric below, including an introduction and conclusion, as well as Part I and Part II as follows:

Part I – Explain the author’s argument in the article that you’ve chosen. In his/her view, what is the correct position to have on the applied ethics issue you chose? What are the reasons that he/she gives in support of his/her view?

Part II – Present potential problems for the author’s position. This will not need to be fully developed. Just give three potential problems with the author’s argument (in complete sentences) as bullet points. Make sure that you briefly explain to them so that I know why this is a problem for the author’s argument. After presenting the potential problems, explain which objection is the best objection to the author’s argument, in your view. Make sure to explain why.

Grading

This paper will be graded on content, not length. That being said, you should aim for 2-3 pages. If your paper is too short, you won’t have included all of this assignment’s necessary portions. Your paper should include an introduction, paragraphs devoted to the reasons for your position, and a conclusion. If your paper seems to be a bit long, make sure every word is necessary. You should be able to explain the concepts succinctly as well as clearly.

Business Problem Assessment

Business Problem Assessment

Paper Type: essay

Subject:   Business

Pages        5 (1375 Words)

Sources    3

Spacing    Double

Citation   APA

Academic Level        Doctoral

Quality     Standard

Paper details

Write a 4-5 page business report in which you formulate and analyze business problems found in three scholarly articles.

Introduction

As a business leader, you will be required to solve problems. In order to effectively solve a problem, you must be able to accurately identify it and formulate a clear problem statement. For this assessment, you will develop a business report where you will formulate three business problems that justify the need for a project related to leadership, information systems, and marketing management.

Preparation

Complete the following to prepare for this assessment.

Readings

Read the following articles. You will be assessing the needs of the organization for improving organizational effectiveness. You will develop a business report where you will formulate three business problems that justify the need for a project related to leadership, information systems, and marketing management. Your audience for this business report is senior executives for the company who will decide whether to sponsor and support the project.

Shufutinsky, A., Deporres, D., Long, B., & Sibel, J. R. (2020). Shock leadership development for the modern era of pandemic management and preparedness. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 13(1), 20-42.

Li, T., & Chan, Y. E. (2019). Dynamic information technology capability: Concept definition and framework development. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(4), 101575.

Lepkowska-White, E., Parsons, A., & Berg, W. (2019). Social media marketing management: An application to small restaurants in the US. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 13(3), 321-345.

Instructions

Write a 4-5 page business report in which you provide the following:

Write a one-page executive summary that highlights your report.

Formulate three business problems that justify the need for a project.

Develop a specific business problem for each of the following three areas: leadership, information systems, and marketing management.

For each of the three business problems, describe how it relates to concerns that businesspeople in the larger industry, field, or area care about.

Support your problem statements by presenting evidence from scholarly literature.

For each of the three problem statements, include an illustration that shows how the problem was narrowed down using a fishbone diagram (Ishikawa diagram) or a cause-and-effect diagram, where you identified the problem, worked out the major factors involved, identified possible causes, and analyzed your diagram to determine the focus of your problem statement.

Select one of your problems and propose a potential Riipen type project that is related to one of your problem statements and can be completed by a Capella learner. Be sure to detail the scope of the potential project. You can assume you are writing a project for CapraTek.

Your report should include the following headings:

Executive Summary.

Leadership Business Problem.

Information Systems Business Problem.

Marketing Business Problem.

Project Proposals.

Summary.

The biggest legacy of the Jim Crow system

The biggest legacy of the Jim Crow system

Work type:          Research paper

Format:      APA

Pages:        1 pages ( 275 words, Double spaced

Deadline:   Oct 22, 2021 at 3:57 PM (19 h, 43 m)

Academic level:  Undergrad. (yrs 1-2)

Subject or discipline:   History

Title: Discussion

Number of sources:     3

Paper instructions:     

In 300 words answer the following using the readings below.

What was the biggest legacy of the Jim Crow system as described by those who lived it?

https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtid=3&psid=3615
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/39/
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/40

cognitive impairment Alzheimer’s disease

cognitive impairment Alzheimer’s disease

Type of service:  Academic Writing

Work type:          Other : Assignment

Format:      APA

Pages:        3 pages ( 825 words, Double spaced

Academic level:  Undergrad. (yrs 3-4)

Discipline:  Nursing

Title: Memory poster

Number of sources:     2

Paper instructions:     

For this assignment, you will choose a cognitive impairment ( Alzheimer’s disease)

1 Psychophysiology

Thorough description of psychophysiology of the cognitive impairment in student’s words.

2 Clinical manifestations and assessment findings

Thoroughly details clinical manifestations and assessment findings

3 Diagnosis

Process for diagnosis described in complete detail.

4 Nursing interventions and management

Clear, relevant priority focus areas for care of a client with cognitive impairment are identified with appropriate nursing interventions.

5 Client and caregiver education

Teaching points for both client and caregiver are clearly identified and relevant.