Current Supreme Court Case Analysis

Current Supreme Court Case Analysis

Discipline: English

Type of service: Essay

Spacing: Double spacing

Paper format: MLA

Number of pages: 4 pages

Number of sources: 5 sources

Paper details:

Assignment:
Write an analysis on a case currently being reviewed by the court.
A case analysis is an extended commentary on a particular court case. A successful case analysis combines descriptions and analysis. The case itself needs to be described succinctly. At the same time the judgment must be analyzed and its socio-political impacts discussed.
Format: MLA – 4 full pages
Required External Sources: At least three scholarly EBSCOhost articles
Required Structure: Your case analysis must be composed of three parts: A short introduction of the case, a detailed description and background of the case, and an analysis of the judgment along with a discussion of the case’s socio-political impacts.
1) A short introduction: It sets out the context for the discussion by establishing what exactly will be focused on in the commentary? What is the controversy? What needs to be explained? State your thesis
2) Description/Background Information:
a) Facts: Furnish a brief description of the facts of the case (which are to be found in the body of a court ruling.)
b) A brief Legal history of the case.
c) Main legal issues: outline the main legal issues raised by the case. You should be prepared to go beyond this synopsis when describing the main issues. This may be an occasion when you might want to introduce extra-legal issues you think are relevant to the case.
d) Judgments: report accurately the judgment in the case. This means explaining what was decided, by whom (e.g. was it a majority), reasoning, was there a minority (dissenting) written opinion?
3) Main Section-Case Analysis: This is the most important part of the essay. This is where your voice is heard on the topic.
a) Critically examine the reasoning of the judge. Discuss the judge’s background, previous cases, or any other factor you believe influenced the judge’s decision.
b) Explain the social and political implications of the legal decision. How do you predict the case will influence the American way of life or the justice system?

HA19 – W3DT1

HA19 – W3DT1

Title HA19 – W3DT1 Prefered Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Essay Number of pages/words 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area   Nursing Academic Level Master
Style APA Number of sources/references 2
Order description:
T. R. (a 23-year-old female) presents to the local health clinic with complaints of two red, scaly patches on her Right arm.

HPI: Started about two weeks ago. She states that the first lesions appeared to be poison ivy. After the vesicles cleared, the itching and scaling remained. She now has new lesions over her left eyebrow, and a small patch appears over her right upper lip. She states that the lesions have not cleared with over-the-counter medications. She believes she has used steroid cream, antibacterial cream, and anti-itch cream.

Questions

What other questions regarding her HPI would you like to ask?
What additional history would you like to obtain from R.H? (Be comprehensive in this response; you have no past medical history for this client.)
This is how the rash appears on physical examination:

Unit 3 DB image.png

What specifically would you assess for on physical exam? How would you document the lesions?
What characteristics would you look for or questions would you ask to ascertain risk of skin cancer?
What education would you provide related to skin cancer health promotion and screening guidelines?
Your response should include evidence of review of the course material, websites, and literature through proper citations using APA format.

HA19 – W4DT1

HA19 – W4DT1

Title HA19 – W4DT1 Prefered Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Essay Number of pages/words 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area   Nursing Academic Level Master
Style APA Number of sources/references 2
Order description:
A 35-year-old woman with a history of asthma is complaining of nasal itching, sneezing, and rhinorrhea. She states her symptoms are worse in the spring and fall. She does have difficulty sleeping due to congestion. She does not smoke but does have 2 cats in the home. She does appear tired but no respiratory distress. Her vital signs are T98.8, R18, P88 and BP 128/80. Nasal turbinates are swollen, boggy and pale, bluish gray. Thin watery secretions are seen.

Based on this information what is the subjective data?
What information is the objective data?
Give an example of 2 questions you may want to ask this patient.

All references must be in APA format and published within the last 5 years.

HA19- W5DT1

HA19- W5DT1

Title HA19- W5DT1 Prefered Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Essay Number of pages/words 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area   Nursing Academic Level Master
Style APA Number of sources/references 2
Order description:
Consider factors (such as disease process, musculoskeletal changes, or environmental risks) that can influence the evaluation of the lungs and thorax and,
Discuss how you will adjust the H&P around these factors.
Your response should include evidence of review of the course material, websites, and literature through proper citations using APA format.

All references must be in APA format and published within the last 5 years.

ha19-W7DT1

ha19-W7DT1

Title ha19-W7DT1 Prefered Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Essay Number of pages/words 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area   Nursing Academic Level Master
Style APA Number of sources/references 1
Order description:
A 32-year-old female presents for an evaluation of a lump in her right breast that she found on breast self-examination. The lump is found to be 2cm in size, firm, and mobile. No Adenopothy noted.

What are two questions you would ask this patient?
What are two risk factors would you want to assess for?
Your response should include evidence of review of the course material, websites, and literature through proper citations using APA format.

All references must be in APA format and published within the last 5 years.

HA19-W11DT1

Title HA19-W8DT1 Prefered Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Essay Number of pages/words 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area   Nursing Academic Level Master
Style APA Number of sources/references 2
Order description:
Today in the office you encounter a patient with an eating disorder such as anorexia or bulimia.

Discuss how you would approach the history and physical exam considering this information.
Identify specific subjective and objective data you would obtain during the visit and why those components are important and how they relate to the eating disorder.
Your response should include evidence of review of the course material, websites, and literature through proper citations using APA format.

All references must be in APA format and published within the last 5 years.

HA19-W10DT1

HA19-W10DT1

Title HA19-W10DT1 Prefered Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Essay Number of pages/words 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area   Nursing Academic Level Master
Style APA Number of sources/references 2
Order description:
You have a 28-year-old female in the clinic with a complaint of an offensive and fishy-smelling, abnormal vaginal discharge. She denies a history of STDs. She reports getting yeast infections on two occasions. Her last infection was a year ago. She used OTC medication and reported relief. Reports that she is married and has not had any other sex partners. Otherwise, she is healthy.

What two diagnostic/laboratory procedures would you order to evaluate her condition?
Discuss your rationale (document), normal findings or range for the procedures, teachings associated with the procedures (e.g., NPO, fasting, etc,).
Your response should include evidence of review of the course material, websites, and literature through proper citations using APA format.

All references must be in APA format and published within the last 5 years.

Evidence based practice

Evidence-based practice

Title Evidence based practice Prefered Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Research Paper Number of pages/words 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area   Nursing Academic Level Undergraduate
Style APA Number of sources/references 3
Order description:
Identify a group facilitator.
Within your group, select a topic relevant to interprofessional leadership and the health care field on which to focus your group paper. The following are some potential topics for your group to consider:
Matrix organizations
Accountable care organizations
Horizontal and vertical organizations
Role conflict and ambiguity
Employee recruitment and selection
Interpersonal relationships in the C-suite of organizations (the relationships between the CEO, CFO, and CNO)
Resistance to change
Succession planning
Whistle blowing
“Just” culture
Team Stepps
When your group has selected a topic, the group facilitator will submit the topic to the Instructor for approval on the Discussion Board in the Week 5 Group Project Topic Forum.
Conduct research on your topic using the Walden Library and other credible sources.
To complete:
By Day 7 of Week 7
As a group, write a 3- to 5 (page count does not include title and reference page) page paper that includes the following:
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Significance of the topic (based on literature that speaks to the relevancy of the concept selected in terms of interprofessional leadership)
Section 3: Review of the literature related to the concept that the group selects (current best practices, positive or negative impact on leadership or health care organizations, etc.)
Section 4: Application to nursing (e.g., implications or consequences for nursing leaders)
Section 5: ConclusionThese are my two sections 2 and 3 in which I have to complete. Our topic is resistance to change.

Section 2: Significance of the topic (based on literature that speaks to the relevancy of the concept selected in terms of interprofessional leadership)
Section 3: Review of the literature related to the concept that the group selects (current best practices, positive or negative impact on leadership or health care organizations, etc.)

Im only responsible for sections 2 and 3 and our topic is resistance to change

Is abortion morally wrong?

Is abortion morally wrong?

Title Is abortion morally wrong? Preferred Language style English (U.S.)
Type of document Essay Number of pages/words 6 Pages Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page)
Subject area Philosophy Academic Level Undergraduate
Style APA Number of sources/references 6
Order description:
Analyzing Reasoning on Both Sides
This final writing assignment allows you to present an analysis of the best reasoning on each side of your issue. In the process, you will get to demonstrate some of the key skills you have learned during this course. In particular, you will demonstrate the ability to create high-quality arguments on both sides of an issue, to support your reasoning with scholarly sources, and to provide a fair analysis of the strength of the reasoning on each side. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the Week Five ExamplePreview the document paper.

Your paper must include the following sections, clearly labeled:

Introduction
Introduce readers to your topic; include a brief preview of what you will accomplish in this paper. (approximately 150 words)
First Argument
Present the best argument on one side of the issue. (approximately 150 words)
Express your argument in standard form, with the premises listed one by one above the conclusion.
Defense for First Argument
Support the first argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You may also choose to clarify the meaning of key premises and to explain how your reasoning supports the conclusion (approximately 250 words).
Opposing Argument
Present the best argument on the other side of the issue (approximately 150 words).
Express your argument in standard form.
Defense of Opposing Argument
Support the opposing argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You are welcome as well to clarify the meaning of premises and/or to explain the reasoning further (approximately 250 words).
Analysis of the Reasoning (approximately 350 words)
Evaluate the quality of each argument, addressing whether key premises are true and whether the conclusion logically follows from them.
Analyze arguments for any fallacies committed or for any biases that may influence either side. Do you feel that one argument makes a much stronger case than the other and why? (There is no need to “take sides,” only to assess the quality of the arguments.)
Support your analysis with scholarly sources.
Conclusion (approximately 150 words)
Provide a brief conclusion and summary of your issue and how it can best be addressed by critical thinkers.

Academic Integrity

Academic Integrity

Discipline: Ethics

Type of service: Essay

Spacing: Double spacing

Paper format: APA

Number of pages: 10 pages

Number of sources: 7 sources

Paper details

Compose a seven to ten (7 to 10) page paper (2450 to 3500 words) on academic integrity that will focus on the importance of academic honesty and presentation of original academic work. As a reminder, the Title, Abstract, and Reference pages do not count towards the page requirement. Your paper must include at least seven to ten (7-10) full pages of
content. For successful completion, your paper must also include at least five (5) peer reviewed
sources and must be presented in APA format and style.