Month: July 2018

Case study – The accurate identification and application of research in nursing practice

Type of document    Essay

2 Pages

Subject area    Nursing

Academic Level        Undergraduate

Style   APA

Number of references         10

Order description:

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student’s ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project.

 

For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” resource to complete this assignment.

 

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

 

NRS-490-RS-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

 

Criteria	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods: Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

 

Criteria	Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
Article Title and Year Published
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
Setting/Sample
Methods: Intervention/Instruments
Analysis
Key Findings
Recommendations
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

 

 

 

 

Algorithm, pseudocode and Flowchart

Type of document    Editing

3 Pages

Subject area  Technology

Academic Level        High School

Style   APA    Number of references         1

Order description:

During this course you will design a program for a state university. The university needs a website design that will enable students to order books online. Each week you will receive additional instructions for the elements of the design based on the needs of the university. The elements will correspond with the concepts and skills you learn that week.

According to the university’s website design request, students need to order five books, one for each of the five required courses that all students take. You need to design a program that will prompt students for the price of each book and display the total cost for the five books.

 

Create a 1- to 1 3/4-page document listing the steps needed to solve the problem using an algorithm, including the following:

Identify the input needed

Define what the input must do (i.e., the process)

Show what the output must produce

 

Create a 1/2- to 1-page document of your pseudocode based on the algorithm, including the following:

Write the pseudocode statement(s) for the input

Write the pseudocode statement(s) for the process

Write the pseudocode statement(s) for the output

 

Create a 1-page flowchart based on the algorithm, including the following:

Mark the program’s starting point

Represent the input steps in the program

Represent the process steps in the program

Represent the output steps in the program

Mark the program’s ending point

Bus 401 Communication (Discussion Question: Etiquette and the Workplace)

Type of document           Coursework

1 Page

Subject area       Business

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style      Other

Number of references  1

Order description:

Here’s Instruction and link for Assignment please answer the questions. I only need 1/2 a page to response the questions. Later during class discussion than I might ask for the response on the 2nd half page thanks

Discussion Question: Week 5- Etiquette and the Workplace

https://www.glamour.com/story/8-etiquette-rules-that-still-apply-to-the-workplace-according-to-etiquette-experts (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Please read the above article. Do you think these 8 rules are still relevant in the workplace? Have you ever experienced a time when one or more of these rules was broken at work? What did you do? How did you feel? Did it affect your work or your relationships at work? Have you ever been the person breaking any of these rules?

Safety (Joint Commission Standards, DOH) in nursing care

Type of document           Essay

6 Pages

Subject area         Nursing

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style      APA

Number of references  5

Order description:

I will post the grading rubric as an attached document and that will tell you exactly what to follow and do.

My topic is about Safety (Joint Commission Standards, DOH) in the hospitals.

in the essay please be sure to include a situation in the the hospital and how it affected the saftey of patient. Use this scenario: there was a patient admitted with alcohol abuse and he was very violent and had an altered state of mind, he used a walker and a cane at home to get around but in the hospital he needed assist to get up if he wanted to use the bathroom or go anywhere but there wasn’t anyone watching him so when he attempted to get up he fell down. Try to incorporate this scene as one of my personal experiences in the hospital.

this is some explanation as to what to do:

• Identify & describe a nursing or patient care topic/issue encountered during your clinical experience and its significance to nursing and health care. (20%)
• Review the current literature related to the chosen topic/issue/concern and provide supporting data using APA style (minimum of 7 references). (20%)
• Analyze, compare or contrast the review of the literature (evidence based practice) with the N483 experience. (20%).
• Synthesize the nursing implications from recent literature to the specific topic or issue and include implications for the following areas. (20%)

o             Practice- What are the best or preferred nursing practice for this concern? Provide supporting data, rational and evidence. What improvements can be made: is it a practice issue or a process problem? How could it be changed? Develop an action plan which can be implemented by the nurse.

o             Education- What are the current guidelines for educating staff about patient care or nursing practice related to area of concern/ topic, provide rationales and evidence.

o             Research- What are the priorities for further studies, from a nursing clinical or leadership perspective.

• The paper will reflect information literary skills (4%)
• Information literacy form must be attached to paper.

** Note: The following information literacy table must be completed and attached to your capstone paper to obtain full credit on the capstone paper.

1) Your topic       State the topic you chose for this project, and explain why you chose it.

2) Search process and Source(s) used Describe your search process as completely as possible. Where did you begin your search, and what steps did you take to get to the information you ended up with? List the information source(s), why and how you used it.t

3) Search terms:               What search terms did you use? Which searches proved the most productive? You can cut and paste the search terms or print out a ‘search history’ when available. How many results did you get from your search?

4) Citation:          Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition

5) Information found:    What type of information did you find? (e.g. primary or secondary) Describe or summarize. Explain why you used this information.

6) Critique of information:           Explain why you chose this information for this project. Do you feel it is authoritative, accurate, relevant to your topic? Why or why not?

7) Time spent:   Keep track of how much time you spent during your information search and list it here.

8) Feelings:         How did you feel about your search experience? Was it easy, frustrating, challenging, difficult, etc.? Why did you feel that way?

please answer these questions posted on here on a separate page. Use 5 pages to write my paper and the 6th page to answer these questions that i posted on here

Cross-Cultural Management

Type of document       Case Study

1 Page

Subject area     Business

Academic Level           Undergraduate

Style    APA

Number of references  1

Order description:

I need you to write me a 75 word script for a podcast (my part will be roughly 1-2 minutes). I want you to focus on these 3 specific things out of the categories; Organisational Culture, Organisational structure and Motivation and HRM. Use as many references as you need to.

 

Assessment Brief

Academic year and term:	Level 5, term 2
Module title:	Cross Cultural Management
Module code:	BUS020N504S
Module Convener:	Yao Semarco
Learning outcomes assessed within this piece of work as agreed at the programme level meeting	Knowledge: You will be able to develop understandings of the nature and impact of cultural differences at a personal and a business level Intellectual/transferrable: You will be able to apply cross-cultural management techniques to a diverse range of issues and develop mindfulness of yourself and others in order to operate effectively and sensitively within cross-cultural teams
Type of assessment:	Group podcast, plus short reflective statement

 

Instructions for assessment

You will work in groups of 4 (maximum 5) to produce a scripted podcast which addresses problems described in a cross cultural management case study.

Formative Assessment

Group Podcast planning document to be submitted in week 8 to enable feedback which will enhance the final submission. One document should be submitted by each group – maximum 300 words.

This is in two parts.

1. Podcast & Script 50%

Group podcast and written script which responds to a range of CCM issues in a single case study. The marks will be awarded for both elements of the assessment.  The script will be submitted via Turnitin. The podcast audio file will be submitted online. If the podcast is not submitted the written element will not be marked and a mark of 0% will be recorded for this part of the assessment.

The case study describes an organisation that is experiencing some problems. Your group should address some of these problems by relating them to a minimum of three to a maximum of five topics that have been covered in lectures. The group should choose a minimum of one topic from each of the three categories listed below (maximum 5 topics altogether) and apply them to the selected problems that you have found in the case study.

The topics are:

• Category One
  • National Culture
  • Organisational Culture
• Category Two
  • Leadership
  • Communication and Negotiation
  • Organisational Structure
  • Diversity
• Category three
  • Motivation and HRM
  • Ethics and CSR

In the scripted podcast your group will describe the problems in the case study, use theories to analyse them and make specific recommendations for possible solutions.

You will work in groups of 4 or 5 to produce the podcast and accompanying script. This podcast will present your group’s analysis and recommendations. It will include approximately 2 minutes of spoken input from each group member. It will receive a group mark where all members of the group receive the same mark, which is 50% of the assessment for the course. You must submit the script of the podcast as well as the audio file.  

2. Reflective Report 50%

Additionally, you will write a reflective report – maximum 1250 words.

The report will identify the sources used to support the argument of the podcast, including references in Harvard style. You should discuss how you applied the theory or theories that you chose to one of the issues you identified in your podcast. It will also include a short analysis of what went well in the group task and what could be improved if you were to be involved in a similar task in the future. The report receives an individual mark, which is 50% of the course assessment

Students will be allocated to their groups by tutors in the first 2 weeks.

All assessments will be carried out by tutors.

Resit Assignment Details

 

Resit submission date: TBC

 

For students who are offered a resit you are required to improve and resubmit your original work as well as adding a further reflective commentary discussing what you have learned from the process. You must resubmit your work using the specific resit Turnitin link on Moodle. The resit will be in the form of an individual reflective report. You should take into consideration the feedback given to you by your tutor both from the group podcast and reflective report and write an individual 2500 word reflective report.

 

You should:

1. Review your previously submitted work and read carefully the feedback given by the marker.
2. Use this feedback to help you revisit and rewrite your work, improving it in the areas identified as weak in the original marking process
3. Include with your resubmission an additional reflective piece (up to 500 words) on what you understand was weak, how you set about addressing this and what you have learned from this that may help you with further assignments. You should address the following specifically:
4. i) Identify tutor feedback points on your original work and identify where/how the resit work has changed (give page number) in response to feedback
5. ii) Identify the lessons you have learnt from doing the resit

iii) Reflect on how your feedback and this process will help you improve future assignments

If you did not submit work at the first opportunity you cannot reflect on your feedback. However, you are still required to submit a reflective piece in which you identify your reasons for non-submission, the implications of non-submission for your future success and how you propose to address this in the future.

If you were deferred at the first assessment opportunity you do not need to include the reflective piece as this is a first submission at a later date, not a resit.

The original marking criteria will still apply (see marking grid provided above*) except that the 10% weighting for presentation will be awarded instead to your reflective piece.

*this refers to your marking grid included in your assessment brief

How will we support you with your assessment?

• There will be an assessment briefing in Week 1.
• You will be allocated to a group by the seminar tutor by week 2
• You will receive formative feedback in Week 9, 10 and 11 on the Group Podcast Plan. This will take the form of session with each group separately.
• Frequently asked questions (and their answers) will be posted on the module’s Moodle site

How will your work be assessed?

Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use the marking grid provided in this assessment brief. When you access your marked work it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.

Referencing

You MUST use the Harvard System.  The Harvard system is very easy to use once you become familiar with it.

Assignment submissions

The Business School requires a digital version of all assignment submissions. These must be submitted via Turnitin on the module’s Moodle site.  They must be submitted as a Word file (not as a pdf) and must not include scanned in text or text boxes.  They must be submitted by 2pm on the given date. For further general details on coursework preparation refer to the online information via StudentZone http://studentzone.roehampton.ac.uk/howtostudy/index.html.

Mitigating circumstances/what to do if you cannot submit a piece of work or attend your presentation

The University Mitigating Circumstances Policy can be found on the University website –  Mitigating  Circumstances Policy

Marking and feedback process

Between you handing in your work and then receiving your feedback and marks within 20 days, there are a number of quality assurance processes that we go through to ensure that students receive marks which reflects their work. A brief summary is provided below.

• Step One – The module and marking team meet to agree standards, expectations and how feedback will be provided.
• Step Two – A subject expert will mark your work using the criteria provided in the assessment brief.
• Step Three – A moderation meeting takes place where all members of the teaching and marking team will review the marking of others to confirm whether they agree with the mark and feedback
• Step Four – Work at Levels 5 and 6 then goes to an external examiner who will review a sample of work to confirm that the marking between different staff is consistent and fair
• Stop Five – Your mark and feedback is

 

Standards Research

Type of document       Essay

3 Pages

Subject area       Case Study

Academic Level           Master

Style    APA

Number of references  4

Order description:

Assignment 1: Standards Research 

Worth 80 points

The following Website may be used for reference to complete this assignment. The Website represents an electronic document titled “Standards Organizations” written by William Stallings (2009), located at http://www.box.net/shared/9dtnzvwys8/1/15730219/164146343/1.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

1. Select one (1) of the working groups in the IETF or IEEE and briefly summarize what this group is working on.
2. Justify the need of the IEEE 802 standard used in networking.
3. Evaluate the three (3) standard organizations including IEEE, ISO, and ANSI to determine the most important for communication technology.
4. Take a position on the need for a federal standards agency such as NIST. Include supporting evidence to justify your opinion.
5. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note:Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

 

Note: Your document is evaluated based on the grading rubric, You must follow a grading rubric and include all the topics in the rubric to earn a point

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Describe the needs of communication networks in a business environment.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in communication networks.
• Write clearly and concisely about communication networks using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

 

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

 

Points: 80	Assignment 1: Standards Research
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Select one (1) of the working groups in the IETF or IEEE and briefly summarize what this group is working on. Weight: 5%	Did not submit or incompletely selected one (1) of the working groups in the IETF or IEEE and did not submit or incompletely summarized what this group is working on.	Partially selected one (1) of the working groups in the IETF or IEEE and partially summarized what this group is working on.	Satisfactorily selected one (1) of the working groups in the IETF or IEEE and satisfactorily summarized what this group is working on.	Thoroughly selected one (1) of the working groups in the IETF or IEEE and thoroughly summarized what this group is working on.
2. Justify the need of the IEEE 802 standard used in networking. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely justified the need of the IEEE 802 standard used in networking.	Partially justified the need of the IEEE 802 standard used in networking.	Satisfactorilyjustified the need of the IEEE 802 standard used in networking.	Thoroughly justified the need of the IEEE 802 standard used in networking.
3. Evaluate the three (3) standard organizations including IEEE, ISO, and ANSI to determine the most important for communication technology. Weight: 30%	Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the three (3) standard organizations including IEEE, ISO, and ANSI to determine the most important for communication technology.	Partially evaluated the three (3) standard organizations including IEEE, ISO, and ANSI to determine the most important for communication technology.	Satisfactorily evaluated the three (3) standard organizations including IEEE, ISO, and ANSI to determine the most important for communication technology.	Thoroughly evaluated the three (3) standard organizations including IEEE, ISO, and ANSI to determine the most important for communication technology.
4. Take a position on the need for a federal regulating body of standards such as NIST. Include supporting evidence to justify your opinion. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely took a position on the need for a federal regulating body of standards such as NIST. Did not submit or incompletely included supporting evidence to justify your opinion.	Partially took a position on the need for a federal regulating body of standards such as NIST. Partially included supporting evidence to justify your opinion.	Satisfactorily took a position on the need for a federal regulating body of standards such as NIST. Satisfactorily included supporting evidence to justify your opinion.	Thoroughly took a position on the need for a federal regulating body of standards such as NIST. Thoroughly included supporting evidence to justify your opinion.

5. 3 references Weight 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present

 

Business Law (Discussion Question Employment Law) Module 6

Type of document           Coursework

1 Page

Subject area       Business

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style      Other

Number of references  1

Order description:

Discussion Question Employment Law

INSTRUCTIONS

To complete this assignment for full credit: post a thoughtful answer to the question below and make a substantive comment on at least two of your classmates’ posts. Remember to follow the rules of netiquette (net + etiquette = netiquette.)

Participating in this discussion will help you achieve unit learning goal 2: Evaluate the pros and cons of laws protecting intellectual property.

GUIDELINES

Be friendly, positive and self-reflective. There is no “right” or “wrong” answer.  A strong answer will be based on reason, law, and logic. A weak answer will be rooted in emotion. Feel free to disagree with classmates but do so politely – no personal attacks! Write clearly and with expression. Proofread and review your response before hitting the submit button. You must post before you can see other students’ posts.

QUESTION

To start, do some research on Lily Ledbetter. Here are a few resources:

Makers Profile: Lily Ledbetter (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Lily Ledbetter and the Fight for Gender Equality (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

A Call to Act: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Question: Given all that Ms. Ledbetter lost and the struggles she went through, was her fight worth the end result?

 

Ethics Awareness Inventory

Type of document           Essay

4 Pages

Subject area       Psychology

Academic Level Master

Style      APA

Number of references  1

Order description:

Complete the Ethics Awareness Inventory Tutorial.

Write a 1,050- to 1,250-word paper regarding the EAI and your results. Address the following:

• Explain the importance of understanding your personal ethical perspective.
• Analyze the relationship between personal and professional ethics in psychology.
• Describe the APA decision-making process and discuss how it facilitates ethical professional behavior.
• List your results, explain your EAI scores, and indicate what they mean for you professionally
• Describe how your ethical awareness inventory scores relate to the concept of aspirational and enforceable standards.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Include TurnItIn (plagiarism checker) report.

 

Please follow the instruction step by step

Please interpret also the result of my EAI result which is I attach.

I include the EAI scoring guideline so you can interpret properly my score.

I also attach the Guidelines or rubric which you should also consider t because they will base the grade on the rubric.

Please use transition from the introduction to the conclusion are connected to each other.

Please carefully check proper grammar and spelling.

The reference on this topic would not allow me to download but the author is:

(Fisher, C.B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.)

 

 

Aquinas Discussion

Type of document           Essay

1 Page

Subject area       Philosophy

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style      APA

Number of references  3

Order description:

Aquinas Discussion

In the middle ages, in the West, there were three dominant religions and religiously orientated types of philosophers: Jewish (Maimonides et al), Islamic (Al Kindi, Avicenna (Ibn Sina), Averroes (Ibn Rushd)), and Christian (Albert the Great, Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus, William of Ockham); all of these traditions were influenced by the work of Aristotle, particularly his works on the soul (De Anima), his works on logic (called Organon i.e. Posterior Analytics, De Interpretatione etc) and his works on Metaphysics and natural philosophy.

Controversially, Aristotle’s Metaphysics gives three different definitions of the subject matter of metaphysics: one metaphysics as concerning (wisdom and the ultimate causes A.1),one as concerning being qua being ( to on he on( Book Gamma. 1); and, finally, one as being a theology (book Epsilon 1). Thus the medievals of the various religious traditions had to figure out how to resolve the so-called ontological view of metaphysics with the theological view. Arguably the greatest minds on this issue were Avicenna (a Persian philosopher from the area of roughly modern Afghanistan) and Thomas Aquinas (Italian; from around Naples); their views are complex and involved but in our context the question of interest is in comparing and contrasting the views of Thomas Aquinas and Maimonides (Rambam) on the issue of the divine names; in particular when we ascribe a quality such as goodness to God what exactly are we saying. Thomas famously says in the Summa Theologiae (Summa of Theology) that we can’t know what God is (that is we can’t know his essence but we can know that he is)(ST I.2.1)

From your readings of Thomas and Maimonides how do their views differ on what we can say about God?

MARKETING PLAN

Type of document Essay

1 Page

Subject area           Marketing

Academic Level    Undergraduate

Style          APA    Number of references 3

Order description:

For this assignment, you will document your hypothetical company’s background information and mission statement, your company’s short- and long-term goals, an environmental analysis, and a SWOT analysis.

 

Note: You should create and / or make all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.

 

Instructions

 

Create the first part of your marketing plan:

 

Write an introduction to your company. Describe your hypothetical company, its location, and the product it makes or the service it provides, and introduce the contents of your marketing plan.

Develop your company’s mission statement.

Decide the main goals that you would like to achieve within the next year (short term) and the main goals that you would like to achieve within the next five years (long term). Determine the most appropriate ways to measure both short- and long-term goals.

Note: Consider the following metrics: tracking downloads of website content, website visitors, increases in market share, customer value, new product /service adoption rates, retention, rate of growth compared to competition and the market, margin, and customer engagement.

 

Develop an environmental analysis that includes competitive, economic, political, legal, technological, and sociocultural forces.

Develop both a SWOT analysis and needs analysis for your product / service. Each analysis should examine three strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for your company.

Use at least three academic resources as quantitative marketing research to determine the feasibility of your product / service. These resources should be industry specific and relate to your chosen product / service.

Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

 

Analyze marketing environments and strategies used to strengthen product or service positioning.

1. Evaluate data and information on customer/consumer behavior.

 

1. Evaluate marketing research tools involved in the marketing process.

 

1. Examine the marketing science of customer behavior and products in the marketing exchange process.

 

Evaluate marketing strategies used to create/communicate customer value.

1. Analyze the marketing framework through a situation analysis.

 

Create an effective marketing plan.

1. Develop recommendations based on market analysis and strategy.

 

1. Develop strategies to assess performance and achieve marketing goals.

 

1. Develop dynamic strategies for competing.

 

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here.

I already have a market plan that i did for a marketing class. So I have alot of the information already. Can you review and see how many pages I need. There is some information that you will need to add.