Political relationship
Type of document Essay
4 Pages
Subject area Political Science
Academic Level Undergraduate
Style APA
Number of references 4
Order description:
Describe the rational actor model of foreign policy decision making as set out by Allison. Raise an objection to the model. Reply to your objection or raise a second objection. In your answer, be sure to define “rationality” and discuss the concept in terms of the US decision to invade Iraq.
P1a Air Fare for assisted suicide which is legal in California
Discipline: Ethics
Type of service: Essay
Spacing: Double spacing
Paper format: MLA
Number of pages: 3 pages
Number of sources: 0 source
Paper details:
One of your best friends has suffered for years from a debilitating disease. The community has arranged to cover the expenses for a travel package to Disneyland in Orlando. The friend asks if she could go to Disneyland in Anaheim. The travel packages cost the same amount. She reveals to you confidentially that she wants to go to California for an ulterior motive. She has learned assisted suicide is legal there, and she has contacted a physician who will help her end her life if she can travel to California. In three pages discuss the ethical implications of her decision for herself, for you, and for the attending physician. When using terms like right or wrong to make a moral judgment, identify the basis of the judgment. Example: This would be wrong if she were a Buddhist who respected all life. Example: This would be right if she believed all unnecessary suffering should be relieved.
The Art of Giving and Receiving Advice
Discipline: Business
Type of service: Essay
Spacing: Double spacing
Paper format: Other (add to details)
Number of pages: 2 pages
Number of sources: 0 source
Paper details:
After reading the article “The Art of Giving and Receiving Advice” listed in the “Additional Resources” section, please prepare a one to two page single-spaced memo to your instructor addressing the following: (article link below)
https://hbr.org/2015/01/the-art-of-giving-and-receiving-advice
why immunizations (vaccines) should be optional
| Topic: | Type of Document | |
| why immunizations (vaccines) should be optional | Essay |
| Subject Area: | Academic Level | |
| Art | Undergraduate |
| Number of Pages: | ||
| 2 Pages Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page) |
| Writing Style: | Number of sources/references | |
| APA | 4 |
physicians, nurses, social workers, and community members Ethics Committee Case Recommendation
Type of document Research Paper 2 Pages
Subject area Healthcare Academic Level Undergraduate
Style APA references 4
Order description:
Assume that you are part of an ethics committees made up of physicians, nurses, social workers, and community members. You’ve been asked to make recommendations for withdrawing fluids and nutrition from a newborn who was born without brain function. The mother is 17 years old and does not have health insurance. In order to assist in your decision-making process, use the following adaptation of the Anderson and Glesnes-Anderson (1987) model by utilizing the following questions:
What is the problem?
What actions will solve this problem?
What are the consequences of these actions?
What ethical principles support each action?
What is the best decision, and can I support this decision?
Your essay should be 300-500 words in length using APA style formatting.
Career Counseling and Early Adult Development
| Topic: | Type of Document | |
| Career Counseling and Early Adult Development | Essay |
| Subject Area: | Academic Level | |
| Art | High School |
| Number of Pages: | ||
| 1 Page Double Spaced (approx 275 words per page) |
| Writing Style: | Number of sources/references | |
| APA | 1 |
The Cold War
Discipline: – American History
Type of service: Annotated Bibliography
Spacing: Double spacing
Paper format: APA
Number of pages: 6 pages
Number of sources: 7 sources
Paper details:
Annotated Bibliography
The annotated bibliography assignment is a selection of sources that you will find and put together based off a subject you choose (with my permission) from the time period covered in the textbook. An example could be the use of ironclads by the Union Navy during the Civil War.
So, the basic guidelines for the bibliography are that they consist of a combination of seven sources, primary and secondary. Secondary sources can include scholarly journals, books, and newspapers from the time period of the subject you chose.
Each source used should be in APA format citation. Each entry will be a small synopsis of the source between 250-300 words. In the synopsis, discuss the information contained in the source and why you would use this in a potential research paper.
You need a total of Seven Sources altogether.
Subjects for the annotated bibliography
Annotated Bibliography
American cinema
Discipline: – Movies
Type of service: Essay
Spacing: Double spacing
Paper format: MLA
Number of pages: 3 pages
Number of sources: 4 sources
Paper detalis:
The movie you will analyse is
*”American Psycho” (Mary Harron, 2000)
Formatting Your Analysis– 12 point and DOUBLE SPACE only!!!!!
Asterisked films are considered from “the edge” for a reason—consider this in your selection of material, please note this.
Screening Reports-asks the viewer to demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of the film and its relationship to a course topic.
Film Reviews-tasks the writer to supply an evaluative commentary in an info-taining manner, like what is published in Newsweek or Rolling Stone.
Formal Analyses are longer works that digs deeply into a more sustained and more complicated argument about a film, genre, or director.
This course asks you to create a hybrid that combines knowledge, research and analysis. In conclusion, the student is asked to supply a short evaluation of the overall film.
In conducting this analysis, the student should consider the following issues both before and after writing.
How is the film relevant to course content?
How can I communicate a familiarity with the film with specific examples from the film?
Have I developed concrete examples from the film, such as dialogue, shots, plot and characterization, to support my ideas?
Have I found research that answers the questions of relevance (so what?) and previous scholarship (says who?).
What are conventions of the genre? How does this film compare?
The thrust of the screening analysis is descriptive, although students may express limited opinions about what is interesting or valuable in the film. Avoid hyperbole and extreme judgments. It is far better to back up opinions or judgments with published information about the film from “experts”.
Recognize that not all readers have the same tastes. One writer might find Titanic thrillingly romantic; another might find it sickeningly sentimental. An adept reviewer might acknowledge this by saying “if you like shameless wallowing in old-fashioned rich-girl-poor-boy romance, you’ll love Titanic. For me, a little bit of schmaltz goes along way.”
The analysis must include A BRIEF PLOT SYNOPSIS, including main conflicts and character developments. Character names are followed by the actor’s name in parenthesis.
An earnest young playwright, Barton Fink (John Turturro) struggles with writer’s block in Hollywood, until he befriends Charlie Meadows (John Goodman) and his life turns dangerously complicated.
Mention striking aspects of the mise en scene such as sets, costumes, visual qualities like color or scenic design, cutting, music, or acting. If adapted, explain the literary precedent.
These stylistic elements can be described separately, but are best woven into discussion of the plot or characters, or the production team (producer/director, director of photography, production designer, art director, and/or editor, and score/music composer).
Often comparisons are made with the director’s filmography, or with others of the same genre. When critical remarks are made, make them with brevity and make them memorable.
There is a half-minute bit in Twelve Angry Men in which the halo-wearing minority vote on the jury, a pinch-faced architect (Henry Fonda), is seen carefully drying each fingernail on a bathroom towel. It is a sharply effective, stalling-for-time type of adverse detailing, showing the jury’s one sensitive, thoughtful figure to be unusually prissy. Unfortunately, this mild debunking of the hero is a coldly achieved detail that sits on the surface of the film, unexplored and unimportant.”
Negative Space, Manny Farber on the Movies, New York, DeCapo, 1998], p. 122)
PLEASE INCLUDE FILM JARGON, I CAN PROVIDE YOU WITH A LIST.
PLEASE answer all the questions, follow the analysis example pages. and site the book use 3 scholarly resources as well and make sure they are scholarly use the reference page i included.
Same Sex Marriage Essay
Discipline: Philosophy
Type of service: Essay
Spacing: Double spacing
Paper format: MLA
Number of pages: 4 pages
Number of sources: 0 source
Paper details:
Essay Structure
Instead of an introduction, you should have one sentence which states your thesis statement. Your thesis statement should be generated by task four and use the following format: I will argue that [Singer] has a better solution to the case of Canadia because [insert your reason here.] So you need neither a typical introduction nor conclusion. The grading rubrics are attached to each the submission page of each essay so you can see the specific breakdown of points.
Explain the case at hand back in your own words.
This should be no more than one paragraph. It’s just a quick summary so I know how you’re understanding the case.
Explain the theories of the two philosophers that are assigned in that particular week.
This should be where you show that you understand the arguments of the philosophers that are covered in a particular topic. So if you’re writing about the Global Justice Essay, you’d explain the arguments of Singer and Hardin.
This should be completely neutral — just a succinct presentation of the arguments that isn’t influenced by or that mentions the case.
This should be at least two paragraphs, and probably more like four.
Present an argument applying the philosophers’ arguments to the case at hand.
Here you should take the work you did in task two and apply that to the story. So if you were writing on Global Justice, you might say that Singer theory would require that we all give the aide to Canadia because of reason Y and then justify that. You’d then do the same with Hardin (although with an obviously different action.)
This should be at least two paragraphs, and could easily be four.
Present an argument explaining why one philosopher has a better solution to the case at hand.
Due to this you need to explain what you think a successful solution to the case would demonstrate and then show how one of the philosophers does this better than the other.
This should be two paragraphs.
Explain what you would do and why.
This should be exactly one paragraph.
======================================================================
<<<Same Sex Marriage Essay QUESTION>>>
In this essay you have five tasks:
Give a clear and concise explanation of the case at hand.
Give a thorough philosophical exegesis of the relevant aspects of Jordan’s and Boonan’s theories. (Click here for some tips on how to do a successful exegesis.)
Present an argument applying the philosophers’ arguments to the case at hand. This should include an argument justifying which couple should receive the marriage license.
Present an argument explaining why one of the philosophers can be viewed as offering a more successful solution to the case at hand.
In no more than one paragraph explain who you think should get the license and why.
The village of Minto has one marriage license to give out per month. Each month, a lottery is drawn to select two couples (from the 100s who apply each month) for consideration. This month, the two couples are Toby and Tayler and Dick and Jane. Dick, a cisgender man, and Jane, a cis-gender woman are aspiring actors. This was their first time submitting their names to the marriage license lottery. They want to get married so that they can be eligible for the new reality tv show called I Hate My New Spouse. They don’t actually even like each other, but that will work well for the premise of the show. If they win, they each get one million dollars and will definitely get divorced after. Toby, a transgender man (born female, identifies as a man, had sex reassignment surgery 4 years ago), and Tayler, a transgender woman (born male, identifies as a woman, had sex-reassignment surgery 3 years ago) have been partners for 10 years. They also have one biological child together (Toby carried the baby before he got his sex-reassignment surgery and they used Tayler’s sperm). They have been submitting their names to the marriage license lottery for the past 8 years. This is the first time their names have been drawn. Who should get the marriage license?
Global Justice Essay
Discipline: Philosophy
Type of service: Essay
Spacing: Double spacing
Paper format: MLA
Number of pages: 5 pages
Number of sources: 0 source
Paper details:
Essay Structure
Instead of an introduction, you should have one sentence which states your thesis statement. Your thesis statement should be generated by task four and use the following format: I will argue that [Singer] has a better solution to the case of Canadia because [insert your reason here.] So you need neither a typical introduction nor conclusion. The grading rubrics are attached to each the submission page of each essay so you can see the specific breakdown of points.
Explain the case at hand back in your own words.
This should be no more than one paragraph. It’s just a quick summary so I know how you’re understanding the case.
Explain the theories of the two philosophers that are assigned in that particular week.
This should be where you show that you understand the arguments of the philosophers that are covered in a particular topic. So if you’re writing about the Global Justice Essay, you’d explain the arguments of Singer and Hardin.
This should be completely neutral — just a succinct presentation of the arguments that isn’t influenced by or that mentions the case.
This should be at least two paragraphs, and probably more like four.
Present an argument applying the philosophers’s arguments to the case at hand.
Here you should take the work you did in task two and apply that to the story. So if you were writing on Global Justice, you might say that Singer theory would require that we all give the aide to Canadia because of reason Y and then justify that. You’d then do the same with Hardin (although with an obviously different action.)
This should be at least two paragraphs, and could easily be four.
Present an argument explaining why one philosopher has a better solution to the case at hand.
Due to this you need to explain what you think a successful solution to the case would demonstrate and then show how one of the philosophers does this better than the other.
This should be two paragraphs.
Explain what you would do and why.
This should be exactly one paragraph.
=========================================================
<<<Global Justice Essay QUESTION>>>>>>>>
In this essay you have four tasks:
1) Explain the scenario as you see it.
2) Explain the relevant parts of Singer and Hardin’s arguments.
3) Give an argument of your own applying Singer and Hardin to the case of Canadia.
4) Give an argument for why one philosopher’s approach to dealing with Canadia is more successful than the other and why.
5) Give your own argument about what we should do with Canadia (NOTE: This should be NO MORE than one paragraph.)
There is a country, called Canadia, that is becoming a global problem. Thousands of Canadians are dying every day from starvation, disease, and exposure. The Canadian population doubles about every 33 years, whereas the American population doubles about every 90 years. To try an increase in their GDP, the Canadian government mines oil from tar sands. This is an incredibly environmentally destructive process that injects pollutants into the air, pollutes aquifers, and kills plants and wildlife. There is also a rampant AIDS epidemic in Canadia because of lack of available condoms.