Earth Before Social Media
Undergraduate (1st and 2nd year)
4 pages
Discipline: English
Type of service: Essay
Paper format: MLA
Number of sources: 4 sources
Paper details:
I need you to redo my essay to see if the essay follows the guideline questions,format for assingment 2, grammar,and punctuation. Also put additional sources if needed for the essay. In the link i provided my Assignment 2 details and also my essay.
Analyzing Facebook: Privacy, Marketing & Revenue Models
Undergraduate (3rd and 4th year)
8 pages
Discipline: – Company Analysis
Type of service: Research Paper
Paper format: APA
Number of sources: 10 sources
Paper details:
This research paper serves to offer an overview of Facebook’s operations and to suggest e-commerce strategies and changes on how it can improve in three areas: 1) privacy policy, 2) online marketing, and 3) revenue models. These three topics will be one third (1/3) part of a larger comparative analysis to Twitter and Snapchat by two other authors who are researching these companies (outline attached). Page one should be a general overview of Facebook’s history and current status as a company. Each of the three (3) topics should be described in two pages per topic, covering the specific features of how it functions and suggestions on how it could be improved in terms of e-commerce. The 8th and final page should outline how Facebook, Twitter and Snapchat compare/contrast concerning their respective 1) privacy policies, 2) online marketing approach, and 3) revenue models that could be easily converted to bullet points. Please avoid use of the word “therefore” when making conclusive statements. Also, please minimize discussion of the current, evolving climate in the news concerning Facebook’s privacy controversy, but instead discuss its vulnerabilities and user perception.
Assignment 1: Challenges to Effective Management Processes
Undergraduate (1st and 2nd year)
3 pages
Discipline: Business
Type of service: Essay Paper format: APA Number of sources: 3 sources
Paper details:
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you discuss the single biggest challenge to effective management process and one (1) recommendation for addressing that challenge.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
Note: You will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills.
The assignment will be graded using the following rubric:
Apple “The Human Family” Advertisement Analysis
Undergraduate (1st and 2nd year)
3 pages
Discipline: English
Type of service: Research Paper
Paper format: APA
Number of sources: 5 sources
Paper details:
Be at least 700 words and no more than 1400 words, not including the title and references pages.
Present a thoughtful analysis of how the ad works to achieve its intended aim. Avoid merely summarizing the ad’s audio/visual content or plot; instead, focus on explaining how key elements contribute to the overall message of the ad.
Include supporting research from the “Pathos, Ethos, and Logos in Advertising” video
Analyzing Facebook: Privacy, Marketing & Revenue Models
Undergraduate (3rd and 4th year)
8 pages
Discipline: – Company Analysis
Type of service: Research Paper
Paper format: APA
Number of sources: 10 sources
Paper details:
This research paper serves to offer an overview of Facebook’s operations and to suggest e-commerce strategies and changes on how it can improve in three areas: 1) privacy policy, 2) online marketing, and 3) revenue models. These three topics will be one third (1/3) part of a larger comparative analysis to Twitter and Snapchat by two other authors who are researching these companies (outline attached). Page one should be a general overview of Facebook’s history and current status as a company. Each of the three (3) topics should be described in two pages per topic, covering the specific features of how it functions and suggestions on how it could be improved in terms of e-commerce. The 8th and final page should outline how Facebook, Twitter, and Snapchat compare/contrast concerning their respective 1) privacy policies, 2) online marketing approach, and 3) revenue models that could be easily converted to bullet points. Please avoid the use of the word “therefore” when making conclusive statements. Also, please minimize discussion of the current, evolving climate in the news concerning Facebook’s privacy controversy, but instead discuss its vulnerabilities and user perception.
NURS 6051 HIT (health information technology) -Use the Data Information Knowledge Wisdom Continuum-Assignment # 1
| Category (Subject Area): | Healthcare |
| Pages (Word Count): | 3 Pages (825 Words) |
details:
I am majoring in PMHNP. So if applicable select topics related to psyche for my papers. Master of science in psychiatric nurse NP.
Class;
By the end of this week, our first assignment is due. Following are my expectations for this assignment. These will be the basis for grading your assignment.
1. Write a 3- to 4-page paper that addresses the following:
2. A summary of the question or research topic that you investigated. The question needs to be precise and instills a sense of investigation and evidence to help you follow the model. Simply asking: what factors affect obesity, smoking, is not specific enough. Questions that compare two different things to evaluate which is better, how effective, and so on are great way to go.
3. Explain how you would work through the four steps of the data, information, knowledge, wisdom continuum.
4. Identify the databases and search words you would use.
5. Discuss how you would take the information gleaned and turn it into useable knowledge, for example using it in a flyer that that your organization can use to educate the public.
6. Answer this question (within your narrative): Can informatics be used to gain wisdom? Describe how you would progress from simply having useful knowledge to the wisdom to make decisions about the information you have found during your database search. For example, how can information technology be utilized to advance evidence based practice and decision support.
7. Your paper must also include a title page, an introduction, a summary/conclusion, and a reference page.
8. You need to review similarity report from SafeAssign to resolve any issues. If your paper has a similarity report 20% or more, it will be returned to you. Make sure to paraphrase properly and to quote material that is exactly copied from the source. Returned papers will be subject to late penalty. Make sure you remove assignment instructions from your submitted file as it will increase your similarity report.
9. References must all be in-text cited in your paper. Any reference that is listed on the references page, but not cited in the paper equals -2 points.
10. Pay attention to your formatting and writing mechanics.
11. It is extremely helpful to include section headings for the different components of the paper. This will help you cover all assignment requirements and also helps you focus your ideas.
Health Informatics Technology ASSIGNMENT #1
NURS 5051/6051: Transforming Nursing and Healthcare Through Information Technology | Knowledge and Information Management
What words do you use to describe pain? What words do your colleagues use to describe pain? Does every patient use the same adjectives when discussing his or her level of pain? Consider the problems these differences can create when attempting to assess a patient’s health concerns.
Health information technology has greatly increased the opportunity for the exchange of meaningful data and information across health care systems; however, in order for that to successfully occur, care must be taken to ensure that patient data is entered in a manner that allows for that information to retain its meaning across different systems. To be able to use health information technology to its greatest advantage, nurses need to gain an understanding of how data and information can be standardized and organized.
This week, you assess the purpose of standardized terminology in informatics. In addition, you are introduced to the continuum of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom, and you consider the key elements of each stage.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing informatics: Scope & standards of practice (2nd ed.). Silver Springs, MD: Author.
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2018). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.
Brokel, J. (2010). Moving forward with NANDA-I nursing diagnoses with Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act Legislation: News updates. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies & Classifications, 21(4), 182–185.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
In this news brief, the author describes the initiatives that NANDA-I will implement to remain abreast of the HITECH legislation of 2009. The author explains two recommendations for the federal government’s role in managing vocabularies, value sets, and code sets throughout the health care system.
Matney, S., Brewster, P. J., Sward, K. A., Cloyes, K. G., & Staggers, N. (2011). Philosophical approaches to the nursing informatics data-information-knowledge-wisdom framework. Advances in Nursing Science, 34(1), 6–18.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article proposes a philosophical foundation for nursing informatics in which data, information, and knowledge can be synthesized by computer systems to support wisdom development. The authors describe how wisdom can add value to nursing informatics and to the nursing profession as a whole.
Westra, B. L., Subramanian, A., Hart, C. M., Matney, S. A., Wilson, P. S., Huff, S. M., … Delaney, C. W. (2010). Achieving “meaningful use” of electronic health records through the integration of the Nursing Management Minimum Data Set. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 40(7–8), 336–343.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article explains the nursing management minimum data set (NMMDS), which is a research-based minimum set of standard data for nursing management and administration. The article describes how the NMMDS can be used to minimize the burden on health care administrators and increase the value of electronic health records within the health care system.
Required Media
Optional Resources
Truran, D., Saad, P., Zhang, M., & Innes, K. (2010). SNOMED CT and its place in health information management practice. Health Information Management Journal, 39(2), 37–39.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Brown, B. (2011). ICD-10-CM: What is it, and why are we switching? Journal of Health Care Compliance, 13(3), 51–79.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases
Assignment: Application:
Using the Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum
Have you ever gone online to search for a journal article on a specific topic? It is amazing to see the large number of journals that are available in the health care field. When you view the library in its entirety, you are viewing untapped data. Until you actually research for your particular topic, there is little structure. Once you have narrowed it down, you have information and once you apply the information, you have knowledge. Eventually, after thoughtful research and diligent practice, you reach the level of wisdom—knowledge applied in meaningful ways.
Are there areas in your practice that you believe should be more fully explored? The central aims of nursing informatics are to manage and communicate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. This continuum represents the overarching structure of nursing informatics. In this Assignment, you develop a research question relevant to your practice area and relate how you would work through the progression from data to information, knowledge, and wisdom.
To prepare:
Write a 3- to 4-page paper that addresses the following:
Your paper must also include a title page, an introduction, a summary, and a reference page.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_5051_Week4_ Application_ Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
| Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. |
Points:Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment exceedsexpectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptionalbreadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback: |
| Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. |
Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. |
Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. |
Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Feedback: |
| Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. |
Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and FormattingParagraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. | Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and FormattingEnglish writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
| Written Expression and FormattingThe paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Feedback:
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
Good 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
Fair 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
Poor 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.
Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.
Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Feedback:
| Total Points: 100 |
Problem-Based Learning
Undergraduate (3rd and 4th year)
3 pages
Discipline: – Nursing
Type of service: Essay
Spacing: Double spacing
Paper format: Other (add to details)
Number of sources: 2 sources
Paper details:
1 -Choose an instructional application (is Problem-Based Learning) from the readings in the Bradshaw text and address the following points:
After reviewing the Bastable chapter on Critical Thinking reflect on a recent clinical problem and describe evidence of the critical thinking components of
1. analytic attitude,
2. sensitivity to context,
3. questioning assumptions,
4. basing inquiry on credible sources,
5. considers a variety of solutions, and
6. pursues ongoing evaluation
Were seventeenth century (1600s) US colonies successful in following the goals their founders desired?
SOURCERS FOR SEARCH:
from the textbook(The American Journey, Combined Volume, 8th Edition)
through the Internet Modern History Sourcebook (http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/modsbook.html)
Were seventeenth century (1600s) US colonies successful in following the goals their founders desired?
To answer this question you must cite at least 2 different colonies (GEORGIA AND MARYLAND), including specific goals, from either the above website or the textbook
All papers must be between 3 pages long, in size 12 font, double spaced.
They must also conform to the following:
· Proper Grammar and Sentence Structure
o No colloquialisms (things that sound like spoken language) or contractions
· Include a clearly defined thesis statement
o One sentence that explains what you are going to discuss, and why
Motivation of Personnel and Practical Reflection
Law Essay 1 Page
APA references 1
Order description:
What is motivation? What factors must be considered in maximizing productivity? What are the various theories of motivation?
Project Management: Define Project Success – Construction project
Type of document Essay 3 Pages Subject area Management Academic Level Undergraduate
Style APA references 3
Order description:
Project Management
Please define project success for a project that is being executed in your state (California) by a governmental agency (Caltrans). Writer, I have chosen the topic for you below with references to use in the paper. Provide a three page paper of narrative that addresses the following for the project you selected:
Paper Requirements:
Project: Bus/Carpool Lanes Phase 1 Project
Governmental Agency: Caltrans.ca.gov
http://www.caltrans.ca.gov/d3/projects/subprojects/00165/index.html
http://www.caltrans.ca.gov/d3/projects/subprojects/00165/files/PDF/FinalEIR-EA.pdf
DESCRIPTION
The Phase 1 of this project will construct approximately 19 miles of bus/carpool lanes on I-5 in the Sacramento area, from Beach Lake Bridge to Route 50 (PM 12.9/22.5). Phase 2 will construct 6 miles of bus/carpool lanes from 1.1 mile south of Elk Grove Blvd to Beach Lake Bridge (PM 9.7 / 12.9). Both Phase 1 and Phase 2 have been environmentally cleared.
PROJECT BENEFITS
FUNDING BREAKDOWN
Local – $33.2 million
State – n/a
Federal – $8.5 million
Estimated Total Project Cost – $71.7 million ($30 million unfunded)
NOTE: This estimate is based on the assumption that this project will be combined with SAC 5 Rehabilitation Project.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Project Approval & Environmental Document …………. June 2013
Complete Design ………………………………………………… March 2018
Advertise Project (if funds are available) ………………… June 2018
Begin Construction (if funds are available) …………….. October 2018
Complete Construction (if funds are available) ……….. December 2022
PARTNERSHIP
Caltrans, SACOG, STA, FHWA