July 2018 – Page 10 – mystudenthelp

In this journal assignment, select two potential problems that a) have two logical sides to the issue (your viewpoint and an opposing viewpoint); b) are researchable; and c) are related to your career or degree.

In this journal assignment, select two potential problems that a) have two logical sides to the issue (your viewpoint and an opposing viewpoint); b) are researchable; and c) are related to your career or degree.

Type of document Essay

1 Page Double Spaced

Subject area Computer Science

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style APA

References 1

Order description:

After exploring the argumentativeness of your problems, take a moment to consider the bigger picture. Then, in one to two paragraphs, briefly reflect on the importance of persuasion with the potential topic you are most likely to write about. Why is it important that people consider your side of your selected topic? Who is your audience, and why is it important to convince them that your view on your topic is the better (or more correct) view? Remember to try to be specific in your assignment, as this information will help guide you as you work on your project in the coming weeks.

Unique Positioning Paper – Why are some companies successful while others are not? Each company has a unique position in their industry and in the market.

Type of document Essay

2 Pages Double Spaced

Subject area Business

Academic Level High School

Style APA

References 2

Order description:

Introduction and Purpose of Assignment

Why are some companies successful while others are not? Each company has a unique position in their industry and in the market. Unfortunately this does not mean that each position is equally successful. In this discussion you will identify and examine one company’s unique position to evaluate if this position will support the company’s long-term success.

Objectives

Analyze the current positioning of the organization in relationship to their competitive approach for achieving long-term success. (2.2)

Theory and Context

For organizations to achieve success in the future, they must analyze their current situation and how they stack up against their competitors. After identifying their current situation, organizations must identify their competitive approach by finding new ways to create a niche within their industry while maximizing value chain activities. The next spectrum is to determine the competitive scope and how broad or narrow the market coverage is.

Resources

Marketing sense conversations. (2012). Competitive positioning: Sandra Burke [Video

file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw97muZ83zM

Instructions

In a 1-2 page paper, find an organization of your choice that has a unique position.
A minimum of 2 scholarly resources are required.
Explain the company’s unique positioning and what their competitive approach and scope is in order to achieve long-term success.
Consider what may force them to adjust their strategic approach.
Examine how Christian values could be integrated within the organization as part of developing a unique position within the industry.
Use the Paper Writing Rubric below to ensure you have met all the criteria for this assignment.

Discussion Rubric

DISCUSSION F level D level C level B level A level

Content

40% Postings do not address the topic. Postings do not clearly address the topic or else they repeat what has already been said. Postings are lacking in substance and only add minimal information to the discussion. Postings are somewhat researched and offer some analysis of the assignment. Postings (min. 200 words) are well researched and involve thoughtful, detailed analysis and critical thinking.

Interactive Responses

30% There is no interaction with other individuals. There is little substance in the interaction with other individuals. There is at least one substantive interaction or there are multiple interactions that are not substantive with other individuals.

Student shows little initiative in conversing. There are at least two somewhat substantive interactions or one very substantive interaction with other individuals.

Student is responding as required but is not adding any new ideas. There are at least two very substantive responding interactions with other individuals (min. 50 words each).

Student is actively engaged in discussing the topic and giving valuable insights.

Timeliness

20%

Initial posts are posted on the seventh day of the week.

Responding posts are not done in time to provide other students sufficient time to respond. Initial posts are posted on the sixth day of the week.

Responding posts are done in time to provide other students sufficient time to respond. Initial posts are posted on the fifth day of the week.

Responding posts are done in time to provide other students sufficient time to respond. Initial posts are posted on the fourth day of the week.

Responding posts are not done on two different days. Initial posts are posted on the fourth day of the week.

Mechanics

10% Standard grammar mechanics are unacceptable.

Standard grammar mechanics are inadequate for this level of student work. Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and standard English are not completely used. Citations are missing. Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and standard English are used. Citations are missing when called for. Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and standard English are used. Citations are included as needed.

D4 – Whose Body Is It Anyway? experiment from the Philosophy Experiments website

Type of document Essay

1 Page Double Spaced

Subject area Philosophy

Academic Level High School

Style MLA

References 1

Order description:

http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/whosebody/Default.aspx

Complete the Whose Body Is It Anyway? experiment from the Philosophy Experiments website. The experiment will help clarify elements of the readings, especially the reading by Judith Jarvis Thomson. Make sure to do all three scenarios, but pay particular attention to Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 since they both directly relate to the reading by Judith Jarvis Thomson.

After completing the philosophy experiment, please respond to the following prompt:

Clearly explain which scenario you found to be the most difficult and why you found it so.

M5 Blog: Marriage as a Civil Right

Type of document Essay

1 Page Double Spaced

Subject area Political Science

Academic Level High School

Style MLA

References 3

Order description:

As you look at the matter of civil rights and the Constitution, it is worth taking some time to explore areas that we consider to be fundamental rights. Some of these are pretty easy: voting, speech, religion. Other rights are considered to be fundamental, but are subject to considerable debate. For example, the right to marry is considered a fundamental right, but should it extend to same-sex couples? This was the legal question at the heart of the Supreme Court case of Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). Remember that the Court ruled in this case that states must allow same-sex couples to marry. It was a 5-4 decision.

However, this is not the first time that the Court has tackled the topic of marriage and its shifting parameters.

To highlight this debate, let’s consider a couple of decisions and opinions from the Supreme Court.

Loving v. Virginia (1967)

Mildred smiling with Richard Loving’s arm draped warmly over her shoulders

Mildred and Richard Loving, an inter-racial married couple, were arrested and convicted of violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law (bans inter-racial marriage). Forced to move from the state or face incarceration, they challenged the constitutionality of the law as it violated the 14th Amendment.

Writing for a unanimous Supreme Court, Chief Justice Warren struck down Virginia’s law and concluded that, “Marriage is one of the “basic civil rights of man,” fundamental to our very existence and survival…. To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State’s citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.”

This opinion would become part of the Court opinion in the following case.

This particular case is really a collection of six different legal challenges coming out of states in the 6th Federal Circuit (Michigan, Kentucky, Tennessee and Ohio). While the circumstances of the plaintiffs varied in each of the six cases, at the core was the challenge brought to state laws banning same-sex marriage.

Writing for the majority of the Court, Justice Kennedy stated, “Marriage is sacred to those who live by their religions and offers unique fulfillment to those who find meaning in the secular realm. Its dynamic allows two people to find a life that could not be found alone, for a marriage becomes greater than just the two persons. Rising from the most basic human needs, marriage is essential to our most profound hopes and aspirations.”

However, this opinion was not shared by all members of the Court. Indeed, Chief Justice Roberts wrote, “Many people will rejoice at this decision, and I begrudge none their celebration. But for those who believe in a government of laws, not of men, the majority’s approach is deeply disheartening. … Five lawyers have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law. Stealing this issue from the people will for many cast a cloud over same-sex marriage, making a dramatic social change that much more difficult to accept.”

Later in the same opinion he states: “If you are among the many Americans – of whatever sexual orientation – who favor expanding same-sex marriage, by all means celebrate today’s decision. Celebrate the achievement of a desired goal. Celebrate the opportunity for a new expression of commitment to a partner. Celebrate the availability of new benefits. But do not celebrate the Constitution. It had nothing to do with it.”

Finally, although the Court has issued the decision, the implementation of the law was not without challengers. Most notably, Kim Davis (a clerk in Kentucky) created quite a media spectacle by refusing to issue marriage licenses citing her religious objections to same-sex marriage. (Time: 4:14; closed caption available)

ABC Breaking News | Latest News Videos

As you consider the topic:

How do you feel about the Court decision?

Do you think Kim Davis was acting appropriately? (Is there really a conflict of rights here?) Accepting the Court’s decision in Obergefell, what types of future challenges to marriage statutes (age requirements, polygamy, etc…) can you see coming forth?

How do you think they Court would decide them – based on the opinions they’ve previously issued?

acute appendicitis — HA W9 R2

Type of document Essay

1 Page Double Spaced

Subject area Nursing

Academic Level Master

Style APA

References 2

Order description:

Jessica Martin’s Main Post Week 9

COLLAPSE

Based on the information provided in the scenario, this patient may be suffering from acute appendicitis. However, much more information is needed to confirm this diagnosis. Time of onset of symptoms would need to be known, in addition to which PRN medications she has taken for her symptoms. A list of current medications is needed. A more thorough exam is needed, including a thorough gastrointestinal examination checking for rebound tenderness and bowel patterns. Appendicitis is the third most common indication for abdominal surgery in the elderly patient. Patients with appendicitis typically present with right lower quadrant pain, fever, anorexia, or leukocytosis. The use of CT scan is necessary to make this diagnosis in a timely fashion. A differential diagnosis for this patient may be diverticulitis, in which the patient typically presents with fever, nausea, change in bowel regimen, and LLQ pain. However, patients may present with RLQ pain if the right colon is predominantly involved. CT scan is recommended to diagnose this problem, as it is highly sensitive and specific for this disease (Spangler et al., 2014). Another potential diagnosis may be peritonitis, which can be caused by a perforated ulcer, appendix, or diverticulum. Patients with peritonitis often present with severe abdominal pain, rigid abdomen, rebound tenderness, absent bowel sounds, hypovolemic shock, fever, vomiting, tachycardia, and tachypnea. She may also be experiencing inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Chron’s disease. Signs and symptoms include abdominal pain, lethargy, nausea, vomiting, fever, tachycardia, diarrhea, and signs of shock (“Chapter 10: Gastrointestinal emergencies,” 2016). For a patient presenting with abdominal pain, common blood tests needed include CBC, CMP (to assess electrolytes and kidney function), Liver panel, CRP and CK to determine inflammation. A lactate level may be used for evaluation of overall status and intestinal ischemia. Blood cultures would be needed as well to look for bacteremia. A urinalysis should also be obtained to rule out urinary tract infection, which may also be another potential diagnosis for this patient (Mayumi et al., 2016).

Subjective

HPI: 70-year-old white female nursing home resident c/o sharp pain in LRQ of abdomen, worse after meals, associated with nausea and vomiting. Time of onset is not clear.

PMH: HTN, Type 2 DM, obesity, arthritis of knee (unclear which knee)

ROS:

Abdomen: Reports sharp pain in LRQ, worse after meals, and associated with N&V. Pain unrelieved with PRN medications (unclear which PRN medications she is taking). Onset of pain is unclear.

Current medications unknown

Objective

Physical exam:

General: Awake, alert, and oriented elderly female in no apparent distress or pain resting quietly in bed

Skin: Warm and dry

Lungs: Clear to auscultation

Heart: No murmurs or other abnormalities auscultated.

VS: T 102; P 84; BP 150/88; R 23

Assessment

This patient is likely experiencing acute appendicitis.

Problem list:

Appendicitis

Plan

Appendicitis: appendectomy

References

Chapter 10: Gastrointestinal emergencies (2016). Oxford: Oxford University Press, UK. Retrieved from https://prx-herzing.lirn.net/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.prx-herzing.lirn.net/docview/2031253443?accountid=167104

Mayumi, T., Yoshida, M., Tazuma, S., Furukawa, A., Nishii, O., Shigematsu, K., . . . Hirata, K. (2016). The practice guidelines for primary care of acute abdomen 2015.Japanese Journal of Radiology, 34(1), 80-115. doi:http://dx.doi.org.prx-herzing.lirn.net/10.1007/s11604-015-0489-z

Spangler, R., Van Pham, T., Khoujah, D., & Martinez, J. P. (2014). Abdominal emergencies in the geriatric patient. International Journal of Emergency Medicine (Online), 7doi:http://dx.doi.org.prx-herzing.lirn.net/10.1186/s12245-014-0043-2

**Provide response writing with references. All references must be in APA format and within the last 5 years of publication.

abdominal pain in the LRQ — HA W9 R1

Type of document Essay

1 Page Double Spaced

Subject area Nursing

Academic Level Master

Style APA

References 2

Order description:

Guadalupe Romero

U9DT1

COLLAPSE

Patient: 70-year-old white female.

History and physical

Chief complaint: abdominal pain in the LRQ

HPI: the pain as sharp and experiences N & V with pain. She is unrelieved with her PRN medications. She reports the pain is worse after meals.

Past medical history:long history of HTN, DMII, Obesity, and arthritis of the knee

Surgeries: unknown

Medications: unknown

Allergies: NKDA

Review of systems:

HEENT: denies any head trauma,denies any vision problems, denies any denies rhinorrhea, denies epistaxis, denies sore throat, denies any hearing issues

Respiratory: denies any cough, sputum production, SOB, wheezing

Cardiovascular: Denies any chest pain, palpitations, or edema in extremities

GI: N & V with right lower quadrant pain

GU: Denies Pain with urination,denies discharge, denies hematuria, sexually active

Musculoskeletal: arthritis of the knee

Skin: denies any rashes, wounds, sores,

Assessment:

Vital signs:

B/P 150/88, P: 84, R: 23, T: 102, Weight: 186 Height: 5’5”

HEENT head normocephalic, no abnormalities to scalp

Eyes: PERRLA, EOMI CN-intact

Ears: Right normal canals tympanic membrane clear, Left normal canal tympanic membrane clear

Nose: no deviations noted or evidence of epixatis

Throat: tongue midline, normal pharynx, normal voice,

Neck: no thyroid enlargement, no carotid bruits

Chest: normal breath rate, lungs clear in all lobes

Heart:heart rhythm regular, normal heart sounds S1and S2, no murmurs or extra sounds heard no chest rub, capillary refill less than 3 seconds, no edema present

Abdomen:tenderness in right lower quadrant, rebound tenderness

Genitalia/rectum:deferred

Musculoskeletal: intact reflex in all extremities,

Skin:warm, dry, no open ares, rashes,

Diagnosis: Appendicitis

Differential Diagnosis: Peritonitis

Plan: CBC with differential, CT scan, Antibiotic, laparoscopy appendectomy

The patient has the presenting symptoms that would suggest Appendicitis. Appendicitis is the inflammation of the appendix, which can cause the patient to had abdominal pain with the most disteing paing being in the right lower quadrant (Appendicitis – Symptoms and causes, 2018). The patient can present with nausea, vomiting and fever. The diagnostic test that would help diagnose would be CBC with differential, and CT scan to see if appendix is inflamed. The treatment can be antibiotics and appendectomy, to prevent the rupture of the appendix and cause the sepsis. The differential diagnosis can be peritonitis which happens in elderly the perforation of the GI tract (Dains, Baumann, & Scheibel, 2012)

References:

Appendicitis – Symptoms and causes. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/appendicitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20369543

Dains, J.E.; Baumann, L. C.; & Scheibel, P. (2012). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care, 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby.

** PROVIDE RESPONSE WRITITING WITH REFERENCES. ALL REFERENCES MUST BE IN APA FORMAT AND WITHIN THE LAST 5 YEARS OF PUBLICATION.

Abdominal Assessment in the ER HA W8 R2

Abdominal Assessment in the ER

HA W8 R2

Type of document Essay

1 Page Double Spaced

Subject area Nursing

Academic Level Master

Style APA

References 2

Order description:

Drew Velasco’s Main Post Week 8 Discussion

COLLAPSE

Abdominal Assessment in the ER

Abdominal pain complaints in the Emergency department are common and comprise about 11% of the total visits (Gross, 2018). It is imperative to rule on the side of caution and eliminate medical or surgical emergencies first. The patient’s perception and description of the pain are vital, OLD CHART is a great subjective tool to obtain all the information regarding the pain. The history and physical should yield the diagnosis some 90-95% of the time (Gross, 2018). Additional testing whether lab work, CT, or X-Ray should only be used to confirm the presumptive diagnosis, according to Gross (2018) “it is rare that “fishing” with laboratory tests will yield a diagnosis when the

H&P does not, and this practice should be condemned” (para 3).

Abdominal Pain during Pregnancy

Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain are very common in pregnancy, according to McCarthy, Lutomski, Greene (2014) up to 80% of pregnant women experience nausea and vomiting, most commonly in the first trimester. Furthermore, signs and symptoms that may indicate additional concerns would include nausea and vomiting persisting past mid-pregnancy (approximately 20 weeks) and associated abdominal pain, fever, or diarrhea (McCarthy, Lutomski, Greene, 2014). However, due to the physical changes that occur to the women during pregnancy such as, the enlarging uterus and fetal position/movement, abdominal pain is also common in pregnancy (McCarthy, Lutomski, Greene, 2014). Additionally, an investigation into nonpregnancy-related causes is warranted when there is pain that is localized, abrupt, constant, or severe or pain that is associated with nausea and vomiting, vaginal bleeding, or fever (McCarthy, Lutomski, Greene, 2014). A consult with an obstetric specialist is then recommended as soon as possible. In conclusion, appendicitis remains the most common cause of acute abdomen in pregnancy, and a delay in diagnosis increases fetal mortality (McCarthy, Lutomski, Greene, 2014).

Abdominal Pain in Pediatrics

Acute problems like appendicitis are rarely the cause. Many children are healthy and growing with no abnormalities on physical examination or laboratory work-up (D’Alessandro, 2018). According to D’Alessandro (2018) “laboratory and/or radiological evaluations should be guided by the history and physical examination and should be used, especially if there is evidence of infection, inflammation, or anatomic abnormality suspected” (para 4). Routine laboratory testing would include CBC, sedimentation rate, liver function test, and a urinalysis should be completed first and then possibly radiographic evaluation may be indicated and usually starts with a plain abdominal radiograph but may also include fluoroscopy, ultrasound, or CT scan (D’Alessandro, 2018). Acute problems like appendicitis are rarely the cause (D’Alessandro, 2018).

Reference

D’Alessandro, 2018. Pediatric Education; abdominal pain. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pediatriceducation.org/

Evaluation of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department Hartmut Gross, M.D., FACEP

Retrieved from http://www.augusta.edu/mcg/clerkships/em/documents/evalabdominalpain.pdf

McCarthy FP, Lutomski JE, Greene RA. Hyperemesis gravidarum: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:719-725.

** PROVIDE RESPONSE WRITING WITH REFERENCES. ALL REFERENCES MUST BE IN APA FORMAT AND WITHIN THE LAST 5 YEARS OF PUBLICATION.

Impact of corporate financing and investment decisions on companies’ overall performance”

Type of document Essay

15 Pages Double Spaced

Subject area Finance

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style Other Number of sources/references 1

MYSTUDENTHELP.COM Custom Writing Services

http://mystudenthelp.com/ for first-grade high school, college and university essays, term papers, dissertations coursework, research papers, book or film reports and case studies. Any assignment guided by http://www.pure-essayexperts.com is free of plagiarism. Read more http://www.plagiarism.org/article/what-is-plagiarism to understand the importance of writing plagiarism free papers. Proper referencing and in-text citations are mandatory for all our academic work. We are proficient in APA, MLA, Oxford, Chicago, Vancouver, Harvard, ETC. We engage our clients in a positive relationship during the processing stage of their assignment after registering with our website at http://mystudenthelp.com/order/client/register//

ORDER NOW

http://mystudenthelp.com/order/

http://mystudenthelp.com/order/client/register//

Short Argumentative Essay – Pregnancy and Fetuses in Criminal Law

Type of document Essay

3 Pages Double Spaced

Subject area Healthcare

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style APA

References 2

Order description:

The Short Essay assignments will demonstrate your ability to utilize bioethics concepts and principles in real world situations as well as clinical and legal cases scenarios from the textbook and outside sources.

For this week’s essay please do the following:

Read The status of pregnant women and fetuses in U.S. Criminal Law by Harris and Paltrow (PDF) – opens in a new window.

Write a 600-800 word argumentative essay including:

your viewpoint supported with appropriate examples and scholarly references.

concepts of and moral reasoning, whenever possible.

APA formatting

Be sure to view the Short Essay Rubric in your course syllabus for clarity on how your essay will be evaluated. You can submit your completed Short Argument Essay by following the instructions below.

Essay Content and Critical Thinking

(see rubric in Syllabus for evaluation guidelines)

Needs Work (0-6); Below Average (7-12)

Proficient (13-17); Highly Proficient (19-24)

Maximum score24

Thesis and Organization Structure

(see rubric in Syllabus for evaluation guidelines)

Needs Work (0-4); Below Average (5-8)

Proficient (9-14); Highly Proficient (15-18)

Maximum score18

Writing Mechanics

(see rubric in Syllabus for evaluation guidelines)

Needs Work (0-3); Below Average (4-6)

Proficient (7-10); Highly Proficient (11-14)

Maximum score14

References and Presentation

(see rubric in Syllabus for evaluation guidelines)

Needs Work (0-3); Below Average (4-6)

Proficient (7-10); Highly Proficient (11-14)

Maximum score14

Behavior case study

Type of document Case Study

3 Pages Double Spaced

Subject area Case Study

Academic Level Undergraduate

Style APA

References 1

Order description:

using this source I need a Case Study Level C case 1 to read and answer the questiond according to the rubric that will be attached . The web site is listed below:

https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdf_case_studies/ics_encappbeh.pdf

MYSTUDENTHELP.COM Custom Writing Services

ORDER NOW

http://mystudenthelp.com/order/

http://mystudenthelp.com/order/client/register//